This was my presentation at the panel “Democratically owned enterprises: a road towards international solidarity?” – 3rd EMES-Polanyi International Seminar.
(…) microlevel may be tremendously political and matters since it may foster different logics of belonging and producing social meanings – something very important when we think of the circulation and consumption of goods. I thus end up with a short story: in a peripheral exchange fair organised “for and with” users of mental health service, the history of a schizophrenic young boy called my attention. He was used to being kept apart from the living room. One day he demonstrated his satisfaction in acquiring social currencies. He said: “Now I can buy the pasta for our Sunday’s lunch”. That is it: social and solidarity economies are not just about facing structural unemployment or economic vulnerability. They may be about something usually taken as minor detail, lesser things: from a safeguarding network to make you know you are not alone to the possibility of social recognition within one’s own family. That is why I say: autonomy should be our keyword.
This was my presentation at the panel “Democratically owned enterprises: a road towards international solidarity?” – 3rd EMES-Polanyi International Seminar.